For the past two months I have been slowly gathering the materials with which to hunt the vicious Signal crayfish, grey squirrel of our waterways, a scourge of riverbanks, fish stocks and native species of crayfish. To do this I have followed the instructions of George Monbiot, and last week I put the finishing touches to my free ticket to a meal. There is bait in a bowl on the kitchen table, and tomorrow – if my courage holds out – I shall be wandering down to the banks of the Kelvin at dusk armed with net, chicken wings (for the crayfish), bread and cheese (for me) and whisky (for the cold). All well and good, but what, I hear you ask, has this in connection with buying a book? I shall tell you.
The art of buying an elusive book that you have only heard of as being extremely good is an adventure. One might spend months hunting through second-hand books shops for it, and the longer it takes the more imperilled the act of reading (my current prey is volume one of the Encyclopaedia of Gardening by John Claudius Loudon – if you spot it please tell me, wherever you are). This is because the effort and desire for the tome in question has the danger of increasing our expectations of the content to a level far beyond that which it can yield. And so, on finding the text, it is often my experience that there has to be a cooling-off period before reading should commence to avoid that nagging sense of disappointment. I fear that this has happened between me and the cray. What happens if, tomorrow night, I walk home empty handed? Such time will have been spent gathering bicycle rim, netting and rope in expectation of the Great Catch, only to have my hunting spirit quashed. I will have cracked open the dream and discovered only the runny mess of reality. A cooling-off period would, naturally, be the best course of action were this a book, and possible only because there are others to read in the meantime in order to take my mind off it. This diversion is not possible in this case. I cannot distract myself with any comparable outside activity – odd looks and worse would be thrown my way if I were to spend my time in Kelvingrove park creeping up on squirrels, I imagine, and so the only resort is to swallow my pride and do it. I can only hope that the Kelvin is well stocked with the aggressive shellfish, all willing to throw themselves at my bait and thence into the pot.
#1 Valen-whines?: Click here> to open the TYPE 14/02/2010 spotify playlist to hear what we want you to listen to.
Fishing for crayfish - don't do it
Robbie, there are signal crayfish in the River Clyde, though not yet in Glasgow, because a stupid and selfish individual landowner put them in his pond, illegally, some years ago and they are now invading the river. It is totally against the law to fish for crayfish in Scotland, or have them in your possession for food, for a pond or aquarium or any other reason. It is also illegal to use a trap in a river unless you have a consent (and you definitely wont get one). An increasing number of otters are dying in illegal crayfish traps in England. If caught with a crayfish or a trap in Scotland you face a criminal conviction and a large fine. Signal crayfish are bad news for the environment, but trapping them does not stop their spread and provides no benefit whatsoever. It is people catching them and moving them around that is causing huge problems in England and will do so in Scotland too. They cause reduction in numbers of young trout in nursery streams and can become a nuisance for angling too. Don't have anything to do with signal crayfish, tell everyone you know - and ignore any celebrity chef who prattles on about the benefits of eating them.
Dear Anonymous, Thank your
Dear Anonymous,
Thank you for your comment. In response to your post i have been doing some research, and would refer you to the following page of the scotland.gov website:
www.scotland.gov.uk/News/Releases/2008/08/15160102
To whit, war has been declared on the signal crayfish and anyone who comes in contact with one should kill it immediately. To clarify my earlier post, you need to have a license to trap crays, which is now readily given, though a lengthy bureaucratic process.
It IS illegal to kill the native white-clawed crayfish, and ONLY the American signaller (many pictures found on this document www.marlab.ac.uk/Uploads/Documents/FW-SignalCrayfish.pdf) This is very important, as the trapping of other species is utterly counter-productive.
As for your guidance on traps, it is certainly true that the licensing laws governing cray fishing dictate which traps they allow and which they do not. However, the form of net (trap was, perhaps, a little misguided) which is mentioned in the post above is rather more like a large version of a childhood crabline - it is not left neglected for any amount of time, and there is no way for any animal to get caught in one.
I deplore the thought that people are moving them and releasing them elsewhere - I can see nothing good in such actions. The biggest problem in England was that before the extent of their savagery was known, people were indeed moving them to a watersource closer to home, but also there are many other ways that the cray gets itself transported: they are remarkable stowaways and care must always be taken to insure that any item, be it boat or wader, is not infested before leaving the waterside.
However, I still hold that responsible fishing for crays is a perfectly legitimate action, and fishing in areas in which the signal population has yet to take hold can help to keep numbers down for a while, and give valuable data to the environment agency in that area as to possible population growth. Added to which, it is surely better to be eating an over-abundant and destructive pest than fish or shellfish that are being depleted so very much - as I understand from your post that you are not taking issue from a meat-is-murder stance.
I am not trying to dress this up as some magnificent crusade - against a river like the Kennet catching the odd hundred has no impact whatsoever - and I hope the sterilisation project will deal with those areas(plans are afoot to release thousands of sterile crays in order to disrupt breeding - much as is done with malarial mosquitoes). There are no 'benefits' of eating crayfish, but they are very tasty, in abundance, and -as long as they are dealt with responsibly - the fishing and delectation of them can do no harm.
Thank you for hi-lighting some of the dangers of irresponsible fishing - I should have made these things clearer in the original post, and I am glad that you have got me to address them.
On a lighter note, I have it on good authority from an agent for the English & Welsh Environment agency that a black banana is an excellent bait.